I usually derive pleasure from reading the magazine every month still I'm becoming disheartened by the waste of space in your "Air Mail" section.I usually derive pleasure from reading the magazine every month still I'm becoming disheartened by the waste of space in your "Air Mail" section. Instead of reading literal meanings contributing to the Air Force's advancement, firsthand experience in historic importances or little known facts, I find more and more epistles concerning faults, flaws and violations construct in your magazine's photos. Do those "contributors" earn points for their sharp observations, are the ruthless violators being apprehended and prosecut or is it simply a waste of space? Perhaps the section could be delet saving paper and ink, or you can stop using photos in your publication. Staff Sgt Dennis Dunn Baghdad International Airport, Iraq I agree with Army Sgt Pedro Gutierrez of Ellington Field, Texas, onward his assessment of the nitpicking by dint of some of your readers ["Air Mail," September 2003] In my 35 years of service to this political division I've witnessed a lot and seen the vast changes in our Air Force. I find the changes positive for the chiefly part with what reserved criticisms I've had usually expos as a inappropriate on my part. For those who find it necessary to "find what's wrongful with this picture," give the quiet of us a break. We diocese it. We just don't find it as a threat to national security like you do. In the wards of Abraham Lincoln, "It's better to remain silent and be speculation a fool than open your orifice and remove all doubt." Senior Master Sgt Keith Burton Jackson, Miss. COPYRIGHT 2003 U Air Force, Air Force moderns Agency |
| Home |
